What’s right for us?

Last night, the House of Commons voted by 234 to 22 to reject a ruling by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) concerning the right of prisoners to vote in a general election. The Strasbourg Court had ruled that Britain is unlawfully preventing prisoners from voting.

The ECHR has been delivering its rulings since 1953, but the last few years have seen a sea-change in its perception as a force for good. EU member states have grown increasingly uncomfortable with the way the ECHR oversteps national boundaries and they’re starting to balk at the international body’s intrusion into their internal affairs.

As individual applications may be lodged by any person or group of individuals, it’s hardly surprising that the Court has been a victim of its own success. Over 50,000 new applications are lodged every year. But it’s the scope of the Court’s jurisdiction that is causing all the aggravation.

As the British parliament prepares to butt heads with the Strasbourg judges, this may just be the opportune moment for the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe to re-examine the terms of reference pertaining to the ECHR. The right of individual states to exercise judicial sovereignty should be weighed against the overarching principles protected by the international Court. That balance could be achieved if the ECHR were to confine its judgements to issues relating to fundamental human rights such as freedom from hunger and want, neglect and abuse.

Laws such as giving prisoners the right to vote are relatively trivial. They do not violate what most people would consider to be fundamental human rights. They should therefore be considered beyond the remit of the Strasbourg Court.

About thespeedofdark

David Winship has written an unauthorised autobiography and several critically disdained literary tomes. His work is frequently compared with Steinbeck, Orwell and Hemingway, but unfortunately Mike Steinbeck, Daisy Orwell and Howard Hemingway were all terrible writers. He has been totally overlooked for the most prestigious literary awards worldwide, which is a shame as most of the words are spelled correctly. In fact, his books contain material that ranks with the finest literary works in history: all the right letters are there, just not necessarily in the right order.

Dave’s blog (The Speed Of Dark Blog) is part of his crusade for truth and justice and universal entitlement to free real ale. It may well be that his whole purpose in life is to serve as a warning to others.

Amazon Author Page

Category(s): Opinion
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.